How licensed data becomes training tasks

Ask what may be created from your records as well as who may receive them. Raw data, training tasks, evaluations and runnable environments need separate scope and payment questions.

On this page

Follow the record beyond delivery

A dataset can become an input to another product. A company record may support a task with an expected answer, an evaluation that checks a model's work, or an environment in which an agent performs a job. Describe each proposed use in the agreement instead of relying on the phrase AI training.

Turing's published program discusses tasks, evaluations and environments built on company records, with compensation tied to those uses. That is a program-specific statement. It does not show that every intermediary pays separately for derived work.

Ask for a use map

Material or use / Question for the proposal
Material or useQuestion for the proposal
Original filesWhich records can be copied, retained or shown to others?
Cleaned datasetWho approves removals and the version delivered?
Training taskMay someone turn a real work problem into a paid task?
EvaluationWho can use the expected answer or scoring rules?
Runnable environmentWhich software, dependencies and credentials are needed?
Downstream productWho can license it, and how is your payment recorded?

Keep credentials out of any example. If code or a runnable environment is involved, use the source-code preparation page to separate your files from third-party components.

Connect each use to a payment clause

Ask whether payment covers the original license only or also later task creation and resale. If a share applies, request the event that produces revenue and the records you can inspect. A percentage without its revenue base cannot support a useful comparison.

The payment guide explains what to record. Leave unconfirmed uses and rates as questions; do not estimate them from a headline payout range or another company's agreement.

Set the boundaries of access

Record which organizations may receive raw data, samples and derived material. Ask whether each downstream use requires approval and whether any restrictions survive the end of the relationship. A promise not to resell raw records does not answer every question about products made from them.

Bring the use map to the first-call worksheet and review sublicensing terms before treating a broad use clause as settled. Your adviser can assess the actual wording against the rights you hold.

Sources and limitations

Partner with Sieve Checked 2026-11-08

Sieve · Primary source

licensing content you already own, or by recording the skilled work your team already does. … Every delivery gets quality and rights checks.

Existing content and newly recorded work are separate discussions; the page does not establish one set of payment terms for both. Publication date not established.

View source reference ↗
Project Lazarus | Turing Checked 2026-11-08

Turing Project Lazarus · Primary source

Through revenue share … You owe nothing.

The no-sale FAQ answer addresses what the seller owes. The agreement sets the payment terms. Publication date not established.

View source reference ↗
Project Lazarus | Turing Checked 2026-11-08

Turing Project Lazarus · Primary source

Licenses are non-exclusive

The page applies this description to licenses to AI labs, separately from Turing’s initial selling right. Publication date not established.

View source reference ↗